‘The controlled demolition of society, named COVID-19, places us at the gates to hell, somewhere between freedom and slavery, fighting a battle for humanity against a government who have become the occupational hazard of being human. […] liberties older than Parliament itself have been confiscated on the basis of a disease with an average mortality age of 82.’ (Dustin Broadbery)
On the back of a completely invalid testing process, a new wave of lockdowns is being imposed on the countries of the world. Humanity is now psyched into believing that unproven, asymptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) constitute a deadly threat to mankind, justifying draconian measures that impact very negatively on economies, human rights and human welfare.
While the northern hemisphere is entering into a new flu season, and one can expect increased sickness accordingly, the new basis for covid fearmongering, world-wide, is not actual hospitalisations and deaths, but ‘cases’ – we are in the midst of a ‘casedemic’.
Back in March the World Health Organization called on all countries to ramp up their testing programs as the best way to slow the advance of the coronavirus pandemic: ‘We have a simple message to all countries – test, test, test’. As the official Covid-19 death toll has dropped, there has been a shift of focus from deaths to ‘cases’, and ‘test test test’ to find these cases. In August the World Health Organisation changed their definition of a confirmed Covid-19 case:
‘Confirmed COVID-19 case: A person with laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 infection, irrespective of clinical signs and symptoms.’
Sot it was no longer necessary to show defining symptoms to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, as is normal for a seasonal virus: for someone to be declared to be suffering from the virus, they just had to have ‘tested positive’. Governments then vowed to introduce large scale testing to find these cases. There was much that was odd about this:
- The shift was worldwide – governments from the UK to New Zealand were suddenly, on cue it seemed, all talking about ‘cases’ instead of mortality.
- The cases are largely asymptomatic – deaths continued to drop.
- The cases are determined by an invalid process, using a test unsuitable for the purpose.
Comparison of UK ‘covid cases’ versus deaths
The Casedemic Unrolls
Most countries in the world have been in a state of emergency since about March. Typically there were extreme restrictions imposed early in the year, then perhaps a loosening up, then perhaps a reimposition of some restrictions. Boris Johnson strangely imposed for the first time mask mandates for shops and supermarkets from 24 July, the very height of the English summer, when people are least vulnerable to flu and colds.
With all the ramped-up fearmongering and the obsession with ‘cases’, the new wave of authoritarian measures should not have have come as a great surprise. At the end of October / beginning of November most of the countries of Europe went into some form of lockdown. The United Kingdom likewise declared a lockdown from 5 November, on the basis that the worst case scenario for the next wave was 80,000 deaths. Those figures have been debunked, but the government has refused to cancel the lockdown.
Mongolia, which has had no Covid deaths at all, has now declared a three day lockdown for the capital Ulaanbaatar, purely on the basis of its ‘first locally-transmitted case since the beginning of the pandemic’. This is being done with a certain amount of fanfare, with repeated sponsored posts on social media from, at least, the Mongolian Consulate in New Zealand. Mongolia is sending a message, that Mongolia too is being responsible, or compliant – what inspired this sudden promotion on Mongolia’s part, one wonders, and who is paying?
New Zealand is now threatened with a lockdown for Christmas – in the Antipodean summer – if we aren’t good, i.e. if we don’t use the contact tracing app. (most important) and wash our hands.
New displays of authoritarianism are being dreamed up all the time. Measures in Greece, for example, include, a requirement that in the case of movement outside the home, an SMS message must be sent before venturing out indicating the reason, or if no smart phone is available, a piece of paper with the reason stated must be carried round.
New Zealand went into lockdown in March while the WHO was still discouraging mask use, and so the use of masks was minimal. When it went into ‘heightened alert’ in August, masks were mandated on public transport (including for secondary school children) and by some employers. Now, although there have been no ‘with Covid’ deaths for months, Director-General of Health Ashley Bloomfield is seeking for masks to be compulsory on public transport for all levels of the state of emergency, thus for the foreseeable future, again purely on the basis of ‘testing’ and ‘cases’.
There is NO Covid Test
Given that authorities round the world, after numerous FOI requests, admit they have no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 ever being isolated, it’s not clear what exactly governments are testing for.
The test most commonly used is the RT-PCR test. The PCR test does not actually show whether the viral particles it finds are infectious or not.
‘[…] patients that have recovered from a viral infection have cells that can continue to produce viral RNA without actually making infectious virus particles. That means it is not only possible but common to detect viral RNA without there being any infectious virus present. (A Virologist Explains Why Covid-19 Coronavirus Isn’t Really Dangerously Lingering on Surfaces for Weeks)
This is clearly stated by the World Health Organisation:
Infection with the virus causing COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) is confirmed by the presence of viral RNA detected by molecular testing, usually RT-PCR. Detection of viral RNA does not necessarily mean that a person is infectious and able to transmit the virus to another person.
And by Public Health England:
RT-PCR detects presence of viral genetic material in a sample but is not able to distinguish whether infectious virus is present.
Another type of test is antibody testing: also known as a serology test, it detects the presence of antibodies in your blood. The problem with antibody testing is that a positive result can be triggered by other coronaviruses, including the common cold. From the US Centres for Disease Control:
‘A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.’
Furthermore, the testing is inconsistent and usually voluntary, being carried out on those prepared to be tested, or caught up in the system.
The case statistics are essentially fraudulent, and do not correspond to hospitalisations or mortality. These fraudulent case statistics are being used to justify the continued imposition of draconian measures.
The shift in focus is often justified by references to ‘long Covid’, long term damage caused by symptomatic SARS-CoV-2. The latest British long covid study with more than 4000 PCR-confirmed participants found that most people fully recovered within 12 days, about 15% had symptoms for at least four weeks, about 5% had symptoms for at least eight weeks, and about 2% had symptoms for at least 12 weeks, so really no different from flu. There is no evidence that asymptomatic Covid-19 ‘cases’ suffer long-term damage.
Covid Response Measures Are a Self-Fulfilling Prophesy
The dangers to human life and well-being of closing down economies, health systems and freedom to move and socialise should be obvious to everyone – except, it seems, to politicians and bought-up scientists. The harm being done is then used to justify imposition of further measures – take, for example, the inevitable consequences of ill-treatment of the elderly and mask mandates.
The cruel treatment being accorded the elderly has inevitably led inevitably to avoidable and miserable deaths, which are then recorded as ‘Covide’, or ‘with Covid’. New York governor Andrew Cuomo moved more than 6,300 recovering coronavirus patients into vulnerable nursing homes; New York ended up with one of the highest nursing home death tolls in the country. About half of New Zealand’s ‘with Covid’ deaths were of elderly patients from a secure dementia ward who suffered a traumatic move to a new institution, where they were deprived of contact with their loved ones. Arguably death was then a blessed release, but it was the government that ensured the ‘blessedness’, and it was a wretched way to die.
See also: Conditions in Care Homes Are Barbaric
Mask mandates are perhaps the most obnoxious of all ‘covid response’ measures. There are obvious social and psychological effects of course, not least the use of masks as a symbol of control and compliance. Science is totally ignored: the long-standing assumptions that fresh air is better than stale air, that deprivation of oxygen to the brain is damaging, and lethal if absolute, are forgotten.
‘The rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of carbon dioxide. […] Oxygen deprivation damages every single organ.’ (Margarite Griesz-Brisson)
Aside from the question of fresh air, issues arise from the accumulation of bacteria, loose fibres and carcinogenic chemicals.
‘I’m seeing patients that have facial rashes, fungal infections, bacterial infections. Reports coming from my colleagues, all over the world, are suggesting that the bacterial pneumonias are on the rise.’ (Dr. James Meehan)
Masks cause pulmonary infections, which can lead to pneumonia and death. Bacterial pneumonia was the biggest killer in the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918, which killed at least 20 million people, according to some reports 50 million or more. It came in several waves, but the second wave was the deadliest. Masks were mandated for the second wave, and they would have been a contributing factor to the severity of that wave.
It is inevitable that an increased incidence of pulmonary illness and a higher death toll from the wearing of masks will continue to be attributed to Covid-19.
Note: a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection has not been established, but in any case the harm arising from imposing them on the general public will certainly be far greater than any perceived benefit. (See also Denis Rancourt’s review of the science relating to mark effectiveness’) which led him to conclude that Masks Don’t Work.)
The Justification for Authoritarian ‘Covid Response’ Measures
Lockdowns are a nuclear bomb for public health (Lockdown Resistance)
In May 2009 the WHO removed the requirement of “enormous numbers of death and illness” for a pandemic to be declared. This enabled the relatively mild Swine flu to be labeled a pandemic a few weeks later, and for the pharmaceutical companies to make a killing, as it were, on the Swine Flu vaccine before it was pulled as being too dangerous. The ‘Swine Flu Pandemic’ is regarded as a hoax and is only of interest now from the view of court cases and pay-outs.
The justification for the designation to be applied to SARS-CoV-2 is equally thin. Estimates of the lethality of SARS-CoV-2 continue to drop, and there is no evidence that it constitutes a greater threat than a serious flu at worst – the covid-19 mortality profile is almost identical to natural mortality, even without taking into account the huge inflation of death statistics by authorities including any death with the remotest connection to SARS-CoV-2 as a Covid death.
‘A patient who has tested positive, but successfully treated and discharged from hospital, will still be counted as a COVID death even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a bus three months later. (Loke and Heneghan, Why no-one can ever recover from COVID-19 in England – a statistical anomaly)
Regardless of how the threat of the virus is evaluated, there are questions over whether the measures taken are effective or, if they were effective, whether the human cost is worth it (see Collateral Global, a global repository for research into the collateral effects of the COVID-19 lockdown measures). The IMF and World Bank have warned that ‘Covid lockdowns and economic recession may drag 100 million people into extreme poverty and set back poor nations by ten years’. The extreme lockdown applied in Melbourne, Australia Victoria, led to more suicides than ‘covid deaths’.
Lockdown will come to be seen as a “monumental mistake on a global scale” and must never happen again. The equivalent of 400 million jobs have been lost world-wide, 13 million in the U.S. alone. (Professor Mark Woolhouse, UK advisor on indectious diseases)
A study comparing American states that went into lockdown with those that did not shows that lockdown measures did not actually reduce deaths.
Yes, But Why?
‘The reason Bill Gates wants you to believe a Corona Virus will exterminate over 450 million people is that he hates nature, God, and you. (A subjective interpretation.)’ (Celia Farber)
Given the crimes against humanity that are being perpetrated in the name of an overstated ‘pandemic’, and the ruthless suppression of dissenting voices, no matter how numerous and authoritative, it is impossible that the Covid-19 narrative is being promoted out of humanitarianism.
One could argue that money alone is the root of this evil: the pharmaceutical companies will reap huge rewards from the vaccines; repeated lockdowns will ensure the demise of small businesses, who will be replaced by monopolies.
However, the cruel measures being imposed in the name of ‘Covid’ are designed to cause enormous, irreparable damage to human health, morale, intellect, and individual sovereignty, thus weakening the bulk of humanity as a species and as a force. This can only be to make humanity more controllable when the plan for global government by the elite, promoted by the United Nations for decades, comes to fruition.
Some reports from ‘Are Masks Effective: the Evidence’
3. Risks associated with face masks
Wearing masks for a prolonged period of time is not harmless, as the following evidence shows:
- The WHO warns of various “side effects” such as difficulty breathing and skin rashes.
- Tests conducted by the University Hospital of Leipzig in Germany have shown that face masks significantly reduce the resilience and performance of healthy adults.
- A German psychological study with about 1000 participants found “severe psychosocial consequences” due to the introduction of mandatory face masks in Germany.
- The Hamburg Environmental Institute warned of the inhalation of chlorine compounds in polyester masks as well as problems in connection with face mask disposal.
- The European rapid alert system RAPEX has already recalled 70 mask models because they did not meet EU quality standards and could lead to “serious risks”.
- In Germany, two 13-year-old children died suddenly while wearing a mask for a prolonged period of time; autopsies couldn’t exclude CO2 intoxication or a sudden cardiac arrest.
- In China, several children who had to wear a mask during sports classes fainted and died; the autopsies found a sudden cardiac arrest as the probable cause of death.
- In the US, a car driver wearing an N95 (FFP2) mask fainted and crashed into a pole.
Dustin Broadbery, The Controlled Demolition of Society
Celia Farber, Was the Covid-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?
William M. Briggs, Do Not Buy The Manufactured Second-Wave Panic
Jennifer Margulis, Wearing a Mask Can Damage Your Health
Cory Morningstar, Face Masks: A Danger to Our Planet, Our Children & Ourselves